Race · Round 2 of 10 ·
1964 Dutch Grand Prix
Jim Clark won for Team Lotus from 2nd on the grid at Circuit Zandvoort. 4 of the starters were not classified.
- Circuit
- Circuit ZandvoortZandvoort, Netherlands
- Winner
- Jim ClarkTeam Lotus
- Pole
- Dan Gurney
- Fastest lap
- Jim Clark
- Entries
- 1813 classified
Classification
| Pos | Driver | Constructor | Chassis | Grid | Laps | Out | Points | FL |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Jim Clark | Team Lotus | — | 2 | 80 | Finished | 9 | fastest lap |
| 2 | John Surtees | Ferrari | — | 4 | 80 | Finished | 6 | |
| 3 | Peter Arundell | Team Lotus | — | 6 | 79 | Finished | 4 | |
| 4 | Graham Hill | BRM | — | 3 | 79 | Finished | 3 | |
| 5 | Chris Amon | Team Lotus | — | 13 | 79 | Finished | 2 | |
| 6 | Bob Anderson | Brabham | BT11 | 11 | 78 | Finished | 1 | |
| 7 | Bruce McLaren | Cooper | — | 5 | 78 | Finished | 0 | |
| 8 | Phil Hill | Cooper | — | 9 | 76 | Finished | 0 | |
| 9 | Jo Bonnier | Brabham | BT11 | 12 | 76 | Finished | 0 | |
| 10 | Giancarlo Baghetti | BRM | P57 | 16 | 74 | Finished | 0 | |
| 11 | Richie Ginther | BRM | — | 8 | 64 | Finished | 0 | |
| 12 | Mike Hailwood | Team Lotus | — | 14 | 57 | Differential | 0 | |
| 13 | Jo Siffert | Brabham | BT11 | 18 | 55 | Finished | 0 | |
| DNF | Sir Jack Brabham | Brabham | — | 7 | 44 | Ignition | 0 | |
| DNF | Lorenzo Bandini | Ferrari | — | 10 | 25 | Ignition | 0 | |
| DNF | Dan Gurney | Brabham | — | 1 | 23 | Steering | 0 | |
| DNF | Carel Godin de Beaufort | Porsche | 718 | 17 | 8 | Engine | 0 | |
| DNS | Tony Maggs | BRM | P57 | 15 | — | Accident in practice | 0 |
F1DB, CC BY 4.0 · drawn by Jules Roy
The outline is F1DB’s, for every layout; the trace is OpenStreetMap’s, where it exists.
Grid to flag
Lines run from grid slot to result, ending at the last lap completed. A dashed line ending in a cross is a driver not classified. Nothing between is recorded, so a crossing is not an overtake at that lap.
Qualifying
| Pos | Driver | Constructor | No. | Time | Gap | Interval |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Dan Gurney | Brabham | 16 | 1:31.200 | — | — |
| 2 | Jim Clark | Team Lotus | 18 | 1:31.300 | +0.100 | +0.100 |
| 3 | Graham Hill | BRM | 6 | 1:31.400 | +0.200 | +0.100 |
| 4 | John Surtees | Ferrari | 2 | 1:32.800 | +1.600 | +1.400 |
| 5 | Bruce McLaren | Cooper | 24 | 1:33.300 | +2.100 | +0.500 |
| 6 | Peter Arundell | Team Lotus | 20 | 1:33.500 | +2.300 | +0.200 |
| 7 | Sir Jack Brabham | Brabham | 14 | 1:33.800 | +2.600 | +0.300 |
| 8 | Richie Ginther | BRM | 8 | 1:34.000 | +2.800 | +0.200 |
| 9 | Phil Hill | Cooper | 22 | 1:34.800 | +3.600 | +0.800 |
| 10 | Lorenzo Bandini | Ferrari | 4 | 1:35.000 | +3.800 | +0.200 |
| 11 | Bob Anderson | Brabham | 34 | 1:35.400 | +4.200 | +0.400 |
| 12 | Jo Bonnier | Brabham | 26 | 1:35.400 | +4.200 | +0.000 |
| 13 | Chris Amon | Team Lotus | 10 | 1:35.900 | +4.700 | +0.500 |
| 14 | Mike Hailwood | Team Lotus | 12 | 1:36.100 | +4.900 | +0.200 |
| 15 | Tony Maggs | BRM | 30 | 1:37.000 | +5.800 | +0.900 |
| 16 | Giancarlo Baghetti | BRM | 32 | 1:38.000 | +6.800 | +1.000 |
| 17 | Carel Godin de Beaufort | Porsche | 28 | 1:39.900 | +8.700 | +1.900 |
| 18 | Jo Siffert | Brabham | 36 | 1:44.000 | +12.800 | +4.100 |
Pit stops
Pit stops are recorded from 1994. F1DB, the source of every stop here, holds none before then, so this race has no stints to draw.
Photographs from this race
Filed on Wikimedia Commons under this race's own category, each shown with the photographer and licence its terms require. The filing is the Commons editors' and has not been checked here.
6 more photographs
Everything filed under 1964 Dutch Grand Prix on Wikimedia Commons
The cars in this race
The photograph each car's Wikipedia article leads with, from Wikimedia Commons: taken wherever and whenever that was, not necessarily at this race.
Where this comes from
- Round
- 2 of 1964
- Grand Prix
- Dutch Grand Prix
- Dates
- Layout raced
- —
- Format
- Standard weekend
- Constructor
- Team Lotus
- Entrant
- Lotus-Climax
- Confidence
- reference
No layout is recorded for this round: this register has no layout timeline for the circuit, and a blank here is better than a guess.